Why do so many people see this delightful bird and think it must be a Red-headed Woodpecker? Because it has a red head, right?! But lots of woodpeckers have red on their heads – see similar species on All About Birds.
As eBird will tell you, the Red-bellied Woodpecker “is not well-named; rarely is the slight red wash on the belly visible!” (ebird.org). This male’s red belly is well-hidden by the Spanish moss and the branch he’s clinging to.
According to the American Bird Conservancy, there are over 20 species of woodpeckers in North America, but the Red-bellied is almost exclusively seen only from the plains states to the east coast (WhatBird). To hear and read more about the charming Red-bellied Woodpecker, check out this episode of Bird Note!
Oh, it’s a handsome woodpecker! I hope I get to see one someday. Gorgeous image.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Deborah. These little beauties are so ubiquitous here in Florida that I forget not everyone out west has the pleasure 😉. Hope you see one in the wild sometime in the future!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome! I never knew this. Interesting how each species gets its official name, even though people might be misled. Any other examples like that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is fascinating how birds have been named over the years, and how their names are changed from time to time. I believe one of my fellow bloggers below comments on that very question of mis-matched names.
LikeLike
I remember thinking this species had to be a Red-headed Woodpecker, until I actually saw a Red-headed Woodpecker that is distinctly different from the Red-bellied Woodpecker. I have given up trying to figure out the illogical names of some species–when in doubt, I like to make up my own names. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, Mike. I think once a person sees how thoroughly crimson red the Red-headed Woodpecker’s ENTIRE head it, they’ll always remember!
LikeLike
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been saying for years that some North American species were named by colour blind naturalists. Red-breasted Nuthatch, Yellow-bellied Sapsucker and Purple Finch are some more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, thanks David! Those are great examples of birds whose names don’t really seem to match their actual coloring. Granted, the Red-bellied actually does have a pale red belly – though it’s usually obscured by whatever the bird is climbing on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a wonderful photo and celebration of the red-bellied woodpecker, BJ, a bird we don’t see on the west coast.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for your visit and your kind words, Jet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve always thought it should be called the Red-Necked Woodpecker.
LikeLike
Now that’s an interesting thought. Do you see these in your area?
LikeLike
Yes, fairly common in our back yard.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Near Lake Michigan, right? The more I think about your suggestion, the more apt I see that it is ☺️
LikeLike
Great photo!
I heard once that the reason so many birds have names based on traits you can’t see while birding (sharp-shinned hawk immediately comes to mine) is that ornithologists named them from specimens in the lab — dead birds lying on their backs. You have to wonder where their common sense was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that’s a fascinating fact. Thanks Amy! I recently heard an Audubon speaker at a conference say that we should really just call birds by whatever name we feel fits them best,
LikeLike
One of my favorite birds. Nice shot. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Kathy! I’ve seen these charming Woodpeckers in posts on your beautiful blog!
LikeLike
Sometimes it happens that the most obvious characteristic of a bird has been previously used and has to be accommodated to fit all other names. It happens to us when you want to subscribe on an Internet list and the as for your name, you write it and they say your name had been used already. So you have to make certain changes in order to get on with it. It hasn’t happen to you?
Lovely photo, Carol. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point, HJ – that certainly does happen more often now than ever, I imagine. Thanks so much for your visit and for sharing your thoughts, as always!
LikeLiked by 1 person
He is very abundant in south Florida. Almost too much so,
but always a beautiful sight to see, what a lovely bird!
Wonderful photo
LikeLiked by 2 people
I feel the same way – he never seems ordinary! Thank you, Eddie!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi might deserve a better name, but that doesn’t detract from his beauty at all!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I quite agree – and I think it’s a sort of unassuming beauty ☺️
LikeLiked by 1 person
As you said, like most people, I wouldn’t have known this isn’t a red-headed woodpecker. What’s confusing to people who haven’t devoted time to looking at birds—and probably to some who have—is that members of a species can have a bunch of appearances that depend on age, sex, and breeding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true, Steve. I’ve often heard bird experts comment that coloring is one of the least reliable markers to look at in bird identification.
LikeLike
I have so many Red-bellies presently around me, I know their call so well! I love your shot with the airplant moss, nice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was up in Lakeland at Circle B Bar Ranch, Donna. Our second 2-day visit there in a month! The trees everywhere are draped in this moss – such a beautiful place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a lovely images of this beauty, regardless of well-named or not 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Anita!
LikeLike
Yeah, I often hear folks misidentifying this one. I’ve always gone under the assumption the Red-headed Woodpecker was named first leaving the labelers to come up with something else for this one. Causes confusion, but at least both species are beautiful birds. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re probably exactly right on that, Todd, especially in this case. HJ also said something similar above.
LikeLike